Ava Kofman published in New York Times, full article available, connecting data to information to knowledge, Media Architecture Prize (MAP) in Hungary: Jury Results-Nominees, Follow connecting data to information to knowledge on WordPress.com, His early work had done more than that of any other living thinker to unsettle the traditional understanding of how we acquire knowledge of what’s real. One of the threads we touched on in the Oppenheimer and the Rhetoric of Science podcast was the relationship between science and religion. His highly original thought is almost impossible to categorize, ranging from philosophy and the sociology of science to religion, anthropology and law. ANT and Media: Do They Connect and On What Terms? In this conversation with the sociologist Nikolaj Schultz, Bruno Latour elaborates his analysis of our new climatic regime and presents new ideas on its consequences for political and social theory. His recent book On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods shows that Latour remains a great star." — Jonathan Rée, New Humanist The Bug's Blog: Bruno Latour, Action-Network-Theory, and Dismantling Heirarchies This blog is inspired by Bruno Latour, Actor-Network Theory, Environmentalism, and a Texts and Technology PhD Monday, January 26, 2009 I am reading it now a lot. Take a look around and grab the RSS feed to stay updated. This blog is inspired by Bruno Latour, Actor-Network Theory, Environmentalism, and a Texts and Technology PhD, Here's a link to Latour's "Virtual Book,", so i'm sitting at a bar (yes, a BAR) talking to a guy about what he does because i'm online and he's on his blackberry and he felt the need to apologize for "our" rudeness being engaged with "nonactors" rather than one another (which was actually my point;). Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. B runo Latour’s Down to Earth explores the way in which global political action today embodies multiple contradictions in our relationship to land. Transgender Studies: Course Listings & Sample Reading List October 15, 2019; FHI-NCCU Digital Humanities Fellows holds second annual symposium June 7, 2018; Table of Contents for Humanities Futures Papers December 4, 2017; Instructor Guest Post: Building Global Audiences for the Franklin Humanities Institute September 25, 2017; Announcing new cohort of FHI-NCCU Digital … Alternatively, find out what’s trending across all of Reddit on r/popular. Principle 1: The fate of what we say and make is in later users' hands. Those are the spaces, I would suggest, where Bruno Latour lands. Reddit has thousands of vibrant communities with people that share your interests. I'm attaching a link to one of my articles that was informed by actor-network theory (and Haraway, Foucault, and others we will read/read about: Here's an attempt to use some of the rules and principles from. Posts about bruno latour written by mkdeacon. Nature, he asserts, far from being an obvious domain of reality, is a way of assembling political order without due process. There is one… Excerpts from: Bruno Latour, the Post-Truth Philosopher, Mounts a Defense of Science, By Ava Kofman published in New York Times, full article available here. I sometimes blog about these things over at parliamentofthings.org . Post author By Kevin Dalton; Post date July 19, 2020; No Comments on Bruno Latour; While I was teaching at ASU I was not really aware of Latour’s work. The quintessential political question… Bruno Latour is among the most important figures in contemporary philosophy and social science. Mercy. See you around! Penance. Latour's PARIS. Graham Harman is Distinguished University Professor at the American University in Cairo, Egypt. Get a constantly updating feed of breaking news, fun stories, pics, memes, and videos just for you. Transgender Studies: Course Listings & Sample Reading List October 15, 2019; FHI-NCCU Digital Humanities Fellows holds second annual symposium June 7, 2018; Table of Contents for Humanities Futures Papers December 4, 2017; Instructor Guest Post: Building Global Audiences for the Franklin Humanities Institute September 25, 2017; Announcing new cohort of FHI-NCCU Digital … should Customer Service be the first visible department? He is the author of Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political (Pluto, 2014), Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects (Open Court, 2002) and Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and … Thanks for dropping by Michael D's Blog! by Bruno Latour* Presentation to the panel on modernism at the Breakthrough Dialogue, Sausalito, June 2015 Wake up you ecomoderns, we are in the Anthropocene, not in the Holocene, nor are we to ever reside in the enchanted dream of futurism. ‘In Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political, I claim that Latour’s approach to political theory poses a strong challenge to reigning paradigms in the discipline. April 17, 2017 April 23, 2017 Ian Bryce Jones Leave a comment. Bruno Latour has become one of the most influential figures throughout the social sciences in the past twenty years. Latour wants to map the world using tags that demonstrate their function. ( Log Out /  In this book, Bruno Latour gives us his most philosophically informed book since Science in Action. More precisely, our relationship to that part of the Earth that comprises the crust and the atmosphere, where we spend most of our time and on which we spend … He is now professor at Sciences Po where he created the medialab in 2009. He made his name by his contrib Bruno Latour The unforeseen coincidence between a general confinement and the period of Lent is still quite welcome for those who have been asked, out of solidarity, to do nothing and to remain at a distance from the battle front. In the 1980s, Latour helped to develop and advocate for a new approach to sociological research called, Latour believes that if scientists were transparent about how science really functions — as a process in which people, politics, institutions, peer review and so forth all play their parts — they would be in a stronger position to convince people of their claims. "Eloquent, amusing and fabulously well-informed, Bruno Latour is one of the superstars of French intellectual life…. Passionate about something niche? Principle 6: The history of technoscience is the history of the inventions that have accumulated to make action at a distance possible. http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CE/0654-march03/CE0654Extending.pdf, "'It's development, stupid!' This obligatory fast, this secular and republican Ramadan can be a good opportunity for them… In a series of controversial books in the 1970s and 1980s, Founder of the new academic discipline of science and technology studies, The mid-1990s were the years of the so-called. His recent book On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods shows that Latour remains a great star." He appears to subsume the sciences within a ground that gives priority to the anthropological, but the indigenous or the colonized never rise above the footnotes. From 1982 to 2006, he has been professor at the CSI (Ecole des mines) in Paris. There is no single reason, of course, but the French scholar of modernity, Bruno Latour, has a compelling overarching theory. Here's a link to Latour's "Virtual Book," Paris. Rule 3: Since the settlement of an argument is taken to represent "Nature", one can't use an appeal to "Nature" as support to win an argument. Bruno Latour. The Bug's Blog: Bruno Latour, Action-Network-Theory, and Dismantling Heirarchies This blog is inspired by Bruno Latour, Actor-Network Theory, Environmentalism, and a Texts and Technology PhD. This obligatory fast, this secular and republican Ramadan can be a good opportunity for them… *** There are many other aspects of Latour’s new book that we should explore, especially Latour’s rejection of two key concepts that many today are drawing on to explain Trump and Brexit: populism (with regard to both) and proto-fascism (with regard to the first). Latour challenges the sovereignty of modern mode of existence, but in doing so tries to make another one sovereign. Professor at Sciences Po. [From Lynda Walsh]. Bruno Latour. More precisely, our relationship to that part of the Earth that comprises the crust and the atmosphere, where we spend most of our time and on which we spend most of our energy… Hey there! Bruno Latour. With the rise of science, we moderns believe, the world changed irrevocably, separating us forever from our primitive, premodern ancestors. But if we were to let go of this fond conviction, Bruno Latour asks, what would the world look like? Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Principle 5: "Irrationality" occurs when people are operating in a short (simple) network- this is not "bad" because "soft" (everyday) facts suffice in most situations (and, because all knowledge is sociological, one can always work towards enrolling them in the longer networks of "hard" facts). where should each component of a company be situated for the sake of entering customers?? Bruno Latour is Vice President for Research at Sciences Po, Paris and Professor associated with the Centre de sociologie des organisations (CSO).Born in 1947 in Beaune, Burgundy, from a wine grower family, he was trained first as a philosopher and then as an anthropologist. Latest Blogs. ( Log Out /  — Jonathan Rée, New Humanist Ces conférences, créées au 19ème siècle ont été l'occasion de nombreuses contributions importantes en philosophie (Whitehead, Bergson, James, Arendt, Aron ont donné ces conférences). Whether they are conscious of this epistemological shift, it is becoming increasingly common to hear scientists characterize their discipline as a “social enterprise” and to point to the strength of their scientific track record, their labors of consensus building and the credible reputations of their researchers. His book, an anthropology of science, shows us how much of modernity is actually a matter of faith. Bruno Latour’s Down to Earth explores the way in which global political action today embodies multiple contradictions in our relationship to land. The Bug's Blog: Bruno Latour, Action-Network-Theory, and Dismantling Heirarchies This blog is inspired by Bruno Latour, Actor-Network Theory, Environmentalism, and a Texts and Technology PhD Monday, January 26, 2009 or: How to Modernize Modernization. Post author By Kevin Dalton; Post date July 19, 2020; No Comments on Bruno Latour; While I was teaching at ASU I was not really aware of Latour’s work. Hey there! Down to Earth is in significant part a restatement of Bruno Latour’s theorizing over the last few decades, made more incisive in the light of Trumpism (and other illiberal populisms) and brought to bear specifically on the moment of or Sales? Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. "Eloquent, amusing and fabulously well-informed, Bruno Latour is one of the superstars of French intellectual life…. Rule 4: Since the settlement of an argument is taken to represent "Society", one can't use an appeal to "Society" as support to win an argument. I n the summer of 1996, during an international anthropology conference in southeastern Brazil, Bruno Latour, France’s most famous and misunderstood philosopher, was approached by an anxious-looking developmental psychologist. Bruno Latour is a French philosopher, anthropologist and sociologist of science. His ethnographic studies have revolutionized our understanding of areas as diverse as science, law, politics and religion. I am reading it now a lot. who makes the decisions? Latour's PARIS. Bruno Latour announces his project dramatically: "Political ecology has nothing whatsoever to do with nature, this jumble of Greek philosophy, French Cartesianism and American parks." Principle 2: Allies used to back up position can include other scientists as well as experimental results, etc. ( Log Out /  Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. Latour wants to map the world using tags that demonstrate their function. Bruno Latour a donné les conférences Gifford sur la religion naturelle. Il s’en explique dans cet entretien exclusif, où il est aussi question de « l’absence de profondeur » de Macron et de la difficulté d’être un intellectuel catholique. Facts, Latour said, were “networked”; they stood… His early work had done more than that of any other living thinker to unsettle the traditional understanding of how we acquire knowledge of what’s real In a series of controversial books in the 1970s and 1980s, he argued that scientific facts should instead be seen as a product of scientific inquiry. Bruno Latour. Latour is an extremely influential figure in the philosophy and sociology of science, and a leading light of the modern field of Science and Technology Studies. but they have an entire component of their company devoted to "Network Research." Posts about bruno latour written by mkdeacon. Principle 4: The more technical the inside of a specialty is, the more outside support must be drawn into it. Here's a link to Latour's "Virtual Book," Paris. Much of today’s discussion concerned an early work of Latour, the book Laboratory Life: the Construction of … He became famous for his social studies of science and technology. Bruno Latour : « Pour tout réinventer, il faut revenir sur terre » Pour le philosophe, nous devons « changer nos façons de raisonner » face à la crise écologique. Thanks for dropping by Michael D's Blog! Bruno Latour was trained as a philosopher and an anthropologist. Down to earth is the message I hear, but unfortunately not in the ecomodernist manifesto. It came up because Oppenheimer frequently mused on this relationship and because the main argument of my book is that the political role that science advisers now play is a mutated version of the role originally designated … Through case studies of scientists in the Amazon analyzing soil and in Pasteur's lab studying the fermentation of lactic acid, he shows us the myriad steps by which events in the material world are transformed into items of scientific knowledge. Rule 2: Don't look at the intrinsic qualities of a statement to evaluate it; instead, look at its later transformations by others. Latest Blogs. Overview of Latour's _Reassembling the Social: An ... Overview/Outline of Latour's _Science in Action_. Review of Bruno Latour, Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2018. His research mainly focuses on the sociology of science and technology. Friday, January 30, 2009. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. April 17, 2017 April 23, 2017 Ian Bryce Jones Leave a comment. Rule 6: When a rule of logic has been broken, don't look at the structure of logic or "societal difference" to explain it- rather, look at the length and type of network. I n the summer of 1996, during an international anthropology conference in southeastern Brazil, Bruno Latour, France’s most famous and misunderstood philosopher, was approached by an anxious-looking developmental psychologist. they have hired PhDs to analyze their target "networks" and identify and locate their weaknesses and strengths (and I guess relate this to office furniture. See you around! By showing that scientific facts are the product of all-too-human procedures, these critics charge, Latour — whether he intended to or not — gave license to a pernicious anything-goes relativism that cynical conservatives were only too happy to appropriate for their own ends (…) But Latour believes that if the climate skeptics and other junk scientists have made anything clear, it’s that the traditional image of facts was never sustainable to begin with. Rule 1: Study science & technology (technoscience) in action, rather than as "finished" science. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts by Bruno Latour, Steve Woolgar, Jonas Salk … Take a look around and grab the RSS feed to stay updated. Bruno Latour I’ve Been Everything, Man. Friday, January 30, 2009. Bruno Latour is a philosopher of science and sympathetic critic of Deep Ecology, which he seeks to replace with a Political Ecology. Bruno Latour Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime Polity 140 pp. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Principle 3: Associations are all there is- "Science", "Society" and "Technology" are not separate entities. Review of Bruno Latour, Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2018. Rule 7: Technoscience can be explained by connections; only if this fails should you talk about minds. It is an extraordinarily complex endeavor but well worth reading about. Bruno Latour (born 22.07.1947 in Beaune) is a French sociologist and philosopher. ", History of Passenger Rail through Headlines, Latour Presentation on Mapping Scientific/Techno Controversies, The Actor Network Resource: Thematic List of Publications, Review Essay: Post-ANT Theory (by Spinuzzi). Bruno Latour The unforeseen coincidence between a general confinement and the period of Lent is still quite welcome for those who have been asked, out of solidarity, to do nothing and to remain at a distance from the battle front. anyway, he works for an office furniture company that works with other companies to research their needs and find the most effective and lucrative (i assume) ways to sell their furniture to these companies. Bruno Latour. ( Log Out /  It is an extraordinarily complex endeavor but well worth reading about. Change ). ", "The Death of Environmentalism: Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. how do companies work? Bruno Latour I’ve Been Everything, Man. Politics since the French Revolution, whatever the complexities of any given historical moment, has habitually been carved up … With the earth reacting to our actions, we face a cosmological shift that leaves us all divided and lost in space. The Bug's Blog: Bruno Latour, Action-Network-Theory, and Dismantling Heirarchies This blog is inspired by Bruno Latour, Actor-Network Theory, Environmentalism, and a Texts and Technology PhD. Down to Earth is in significant part a restatement of Bruno Latour’s theorizing over the last few decades, made more incisive in the light of Trumpism (and other illiberal populisms) and brought to bear specifically on the moment of